YES

The TRS could be proven terminating. The proof took 458 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor DependencyGraph (4ms).
 | – Problem 2 was processed with processor PolynomialOrderingProcessor (143ms).
 | – Problem 3 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (0ms).

Problem 1: DependencyGraph



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

bits#(s(x))half#(s(x))bits#(s(x))bits#(half(s(x)))
half#(s(s(x)))half#(x)

Rewrite Rules

half(0)0half(s(0))0
half(s(s(x)))s(half(x))bits(0)0
bits(s(x))s(bits(half(s(x))))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 0, s, bits, half

Strategy


The following SCCs where found

bits#(s(x)) → bits#(half(s(x)))

half#(s(s(x))) → half#(x)

Problem 2: PolynomialOrderingProcessor



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

bits#(s(x))bits#(half(s(x)))

Rewrite Rules

half(0)0half(s(0))0
half(s(s(x)))s(half(x))bits(0)0
bits(s(x))s(bits(half(s(x))))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 0, s, bits, half

Strategy


Polynomial Interpretation

Improved Usable rules

half(s(0))0half(0)0
half(s(s(x)))s(half(x))

The following dependency pairs are strictly oriented by an ordering on the given polynomial interpretation, thus they are removed:

bits#(s(x))bits#(half(s(x)))

Problem 3: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

half#(s(s(x)))half#(x)

Rewrite Rules

half(0)0half(s(0))0
half(s(s(x)))s(half(x))bits(0)0
bits(s(x))s(bits(half(s(x))))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 0, s, bits, half

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

half#(s(s(x)))half#(x)