YES

The TRS could be proven terminating. The proof took 31 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (1ms).
 | – Problem 2 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (1ms).

Problem 1: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

*#(+(x, y), z)*#(x, z)*#(x, oplus(y, z))*#(x, y)
*#(x, oplus(y, z))*#(x, z)*#(+(x, y), z)*#(y, z)
*#(x, *(y, z))*#(otimes(x, y), z)

Rewrite Rules

*(x, *(y, z))*(otimes(x, y), z)*(1, y)y
*(+(x, y), z)oplus(*(x, z), *(y, z))*(x, oplus(y, z))oplus(*(x, y), *(x, z))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 1, otimes, *, +, oplus

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

*#(x, oplus(y, z))*#(x, y)*#(x, oplus(y, z))*#(x, z)
*#(x, *(y, z))*#(otimes(x, y), z)

Problem 2: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

*#(+(x, y), z)*#(x, z)*#(+(x, y), z)*#(y, z)

Rewrite Rules

*(x, *(y, z))*(otimes(x, y), z)*(1, y)y
*(+(x, y), z)oplus(*(x, z), *(y, z))*(x, oplus(y, z))oplus(*(x, y), *(x, z))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 1, otimes, *, +, oplus

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

*#(+(x, y), z)*#(x, z)*#(+(x, y), z)*#(y, z)