YES

The TRS could be proven terminating. The proof took 25 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (1ms).
 | – Problem 2 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (1ms).

Problem 1: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

*#(x, +(y, z))*#(x, z)*#(+(x, y), z)*#(x, z)
*#(x, +(y, z))*#(x, y)*#(+(x, y), z)*#(y, z)

Rewrite Rules

*(x, +(y, z))+(*(x, y), *(x, z))*(+(x, y), z)+(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, 1)x*(1, y)y

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 1, *, +

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

*#(+(x, y), z)*#(x, z)*#(+(x, y), z)*#(y, z)

Problem 2: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

*#(x, +(y, z))*#(x, z)*#(x, +(y, z))*#(x, y)

Rewrite Rules

*(x, +(y, z))+(*(x, y), *(x, z))*(+(x, y), z)+(*(x, z), *(y, z))
*(x, 1)x*(1, y)y

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: 1, *, +

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

*#(x, +(y, z))*#(x, z)*#(x, +(y, z))*#(x, y)