YES

The TRS could be proven terminating. The proof took 52 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (1ms).
 | – Problem 2 was processed with processor DependencyGraph (1ms).

Problem 1: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

g#(h(x), y)f#(x, y)f#(x, y)g#(x, y)
g#(h(x), y)g#(x, y)

Rewrite Rules

f(x, y)g(x, y)g(h(x), y)h(f(x, y))
g(h(x), y)h(g(x, y))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: f, g, h

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

g#(h(x), y)f#(x, y)g#(h(x), y)g#(x, y)

Problem 2: DependencyGraph



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

f#(x, y)g#(x, y)

Rewrite Rules

f(x, y)g(x, y)g(h(x), y)h(f(x, y))
g(h(x), y)h(g(x, y))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: f, g, h

Strategy


There are no SCCs!