YES

The TRS could be proven terminating. The proof took 31 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor SubtermCriterion (1ms).

Problem 1: SubtermCriterion



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

f#(g(x, y), z) → f#(x, z)f#(f(x, y), z) → f#(y, z)
f#(f(x, y), z) → f#(x, f(y, z))f#(g(x, y), z) → f#(y, z)

Rewrite Rules

f(0, y) → yf(x, 0) → x
f(i(x), y) → i(x)f(f(x, y), z) → f(x, f(y, z))
f(g(x, y), z) → g(f(x, z), f(y, z))f(1, g(x, y)) → x
f(2, g(x, y)) → y

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: f, g, 2, 1, 0, i

Strategy


Projection

The following projection was used:

Thus, the following dependency pairs are removed:

f#(g(x, y), z) → f#(x, z)f#(f(x, y), z) → f#(y, z)
f#(f(x, y), z) → f#(x, f(y, z))f#(g(x, y), z) → f#(y, z)