TIMEOUT

The TRS could not be proven terminating. The proof attempt took 60046 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (782ms).
 | – Problem 2 remains open; application of the following processors failed [DependencyGraph (1ms), PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (455ms), DependencyGraph (1ms), PolynomialLinearRange8NegiUR (12301ms), DependencyGraph (1ms), ReductionPairSAT (timeout)].

The following open problems remain:



Open Dependency Pair Problem 2

Dependency Pairs

p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) → p#(p(b(x2), a(a(b(x1)))), p(x3, x0))

Rewrite Rules

p(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) → p(p(b(x2), a(a(b(x1)))), p(x3, x0))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: b, p, a


Problem 1: PolynomialLinearRange4iUR



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) → p#(x3, x0)p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) → p#(b(x2), a(a(b(x1))))
p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) → p#(p(b(x2), a(a(b(x1)))), p(x3, x0))

Rewrite Rules

p(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) → p(p(b(x2), a(a(b(x1)))), p(x3, x0))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: b, p, a

Strategy


Polynomial Interpretation

Improved Usable rules

p(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) → p(p(b(x2), a(a(b(x1)))), p(x3, x0))

The following dependency pairs are strictly oriented by an ordering on the given polynomial interpretation, thus they are removed:

p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) → p#(x3, x0)p#(p(b(a(x0)), x1), p(x2, x3)) → p#(b(x2), a(a(b(x1))))