YES

The TRS could be proven terminating. The proof took 534 ms.

The following DP Processors were used


Problem 1 was processed with processor DependencyGraph (4ms).
 | – Problem 2 was processed with processor PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (169ms).
 | – Problem 3 was processed with processor PolynomialLinearRange4iUR (208ms).

Problem 1: DependencyGraph



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

f#(g(x))f#(x)f'#(s(x), y, y)f'#(y, x, s(x))
f#(g(x))f#(f(x))

Rewrite Rules

f(g(x))g(f(f(x)))f(h(x))h(g(x))
f'(s(x), y, y)f'(y, x, s(x))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: f, f', g, s, h

Strategy


The following SCCs where found

f#(g(x)) → f#(x)f#(g(x)) → f#(f(x))

f'#(s(x), y, y) → f'#(y, x, s(x))

Problem 2: PolynomialLinearRange4iUR



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

f#(g(x))f#(x)f#(g(x))f#(f(x))

Rewrite Rules

f(g(x))g(f(f(x)))f(h(x))h(g(x))
f'(s(x), y, y)f'(y, x, s(x))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: f, f', g, s, h

Strategy


Polynomial Interpretation

Improved Usable rules

f(h(x))h(g(x))f(g(x))g(f(f(x)))

The following dependency pairs are strictly oriented by an ordering on the given polynomial interpretation, thus they are removed:

f#(g(x))f#(x)f#(g(x))f#(f(x))

Problem 3: PolynomialLinearRange4iUR



Dependency Pair Problem

Dependency Pairs

f'#(s(x), y, y)f'#(y, x, s(x))

Rewrite Rules

f(g(x))g(f(f(x)))f(h(x))h(g(x))
f'(s(x), y, y)f'(y, x, s(x))

Original Signature

Termination of terms over the following signature is verified: f, f', g, s, h

Strategy


Polynomial Interpretation

There are no usable rules

The following dependency pairs are strictly oriented by an ordering on the given polynomial interpretation, thus they are removed:

f'#(s(x), y, y)f'#(y, x, s(x))