Submit the part after "cut here" to chrisf@logic.at.
Don't change the file format (ASCII) and layout!
REPLACE text in set brackets {....} as appropriate.

===== cut here =====  cut here ====== cut here ===== 
---------------------------------------------------------
Name of reviewer: { your first name }  { your FAMILY NAME } 
(NOTE: Your name will not be forwarded to other participants!)

*********************************************************
Reviewed essay
Number: { according to http://www.logic.at/lvas/SemAI/#essays }
Title:  { as given in the seminar paper by the author }
Author:  { first name } { FAMILY NAME } 
=========================================================
Mark the following categories separately using
0 to 5 (integer) points. 

For your orientation:
Points |  approximate meaning
--------------------------
0      |  "completely unsatisfying"
1      |  "bad, many problems"
2      |  "unsatisfying, but not a disaster"
3      |  "acceptable, but room for improvements"
4      |  "fine, but not 100% perfect"
5      |  "flawless" 
---------------------------------------------------------
Insert points (0,1,2,3,4 or 5) in the square brackets: 
----------------------------------------------------------
(C) Contents
    (Is all information sound and clearly stated? Is there 
    adequate material presented? Are all used sources clear? 
    Is the amount of information and level of detail 
    appropriate with respect to length restrictions?):  [ ]
(S) Structure                                         
    (Is the information clearly and appropriately
    structured? E.g., is there a clear separation between
    the summary of the contents of the underlying paper
    and its evaluation? Is the title/conclusion/[abstract,
    if applicable] appropriate):                       [ ]     
(R) References
    (Are all citations clearly referenced in appropriate
    form? Are there enough/too many citations? Is the 
    origin of all presented information always clear?
    Compare with instructions for correct citation, as
    they can be found on the internet, in particular about
    the correct citation of internet resources!):      [ ]      
(L) Linguistic competence
    (Orthography, grammar, idioms, readability etc.):  [ ]
(F) Format
    (Layout, spacing, font size, visual structure, etc.
    Is the text processing system used competently?):  [ ]

(O) Overall impression:                                [ ]
----------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT:
Use the following space to EXPLAIN and JUSTIFY your marks, 
categorized as indicated above. Illustrate your criticism by
examples whenever possible. Most importantly: for all 
detected problems try to make concrete SUGGESTIONS FOR
IMPROVEMENTS. 
----------------------------------------------------------
(C)





















----------------------------------------------------------
(S)










----------------------------------------------------------
(R)










----------------------------------------------------------
(L)









----------------------------------------------------------
(F)









----------------------------------------------------------
(O)









----------------------------------------------------------
ADD FURTHER DETAILS HERE, IF APPROPRIATE:













-----------------------------------------------------------